Richard Price, HIP health & environment co-editor and writer, specialising in climate change with an MSc in Biological Recording: Collection and Management with The University of Birmingham, explores the current crisis. 

Dawn Butler was recently suspended from Parliament for pointing out that Boris Johnson had misled it during the pandemic. She complained that she was in trouble for pointing out a liar when the liar himself was getting away with it. 

In fact, the government is not above lying to the public on just about everything, including the coming life-threatening disaster of climate change.

It claims it is making good progress towards meeting an emissions target. Ministers reassure people that the current policies are working. But, in reality, the public is being misled into thinking that things are under control. 

The response to a recent petition demonstrates the type of com-forting patter that they use. Signatories of petition number 574678 are asking for the climate crisis and air pollution to be tackled by introducing charges on carbon emissions. The government responded: “In June 2019, the UK became the first major economy to legislate for net zero emissions by 2050 and the Government remains committed to maintaining an ambitious carbon price.”

There are two problems with that response. First, achieving net zero emissions by 2050 is too late to avoid catastrophic climate change. It is happening at a rate that is surprising scientists, and that rate is accelerating. Second, they omit to say that the target consists of carbon production pricing, which will not work.

Catastrophe in brief

We haven’t got time for inaction or the wrong action on climate change – a catastrophe is in the making and unfolding fast. Carbon emissions, sea ice thickness, ocean acidification, heating and wildfires are setting new records. It means that Earth’s climate is approaching the point of no return.

Difference in carbon pricing consumption or production

The government is deceiving the public to cover its business-as-usual approach. It knows that most people do not understand the difference between carbon consumption and production. One works and could cut emissions quickly enough whereas the other is slow and does not. Pricing production rather than consumption does not reduce emissions but just moves them elsewhere. The government knows that people are ignorant of this difference and exploits it. It deceives the public by making people believe that its policies are working.

Carbon production pricing involves putting a price on producing carbon. This is the option chosen by the government. It brings territorial emissions in the UK down, but carbon emissions increase elsewhere. Everything remains unchanged because instead of making goods we import carbon intensive products from countries such as China. With this policy in place the government is globally increasing emissions while claiming to “maintain an ambitious carbon price”.

Carbon consumption pricing would rapidly bring emissions down. It involves pricing from the bottom up. If the government adopted a net zero carbon consumption target, we would have a chance of reducing global emissions. Other countries could copy our example. Carbon consumption rather than just production would change consumer habits. The addition of a carbon border tax would create more equality between home producers and those carbon exporting countries.

The unfolding catastrophe

We are close to or have already gone beyond the tipping point – the point of no return. For example, the Amazon rainforest, previously a carbon sink, is now emitting a billion tonnes of carbon dioxide a year. It will have a new climate of raging heat from 2028 onwards.

Scientists say that major ecosystems essential for our survival are likely to be suffering irreversible collapse. Even resilient natural habitats are in peril in the near term without action. Nearly 14,000 scientists recently warned that Earth’s vital signs are rapidly worsening.

When something in the climate changes for the first time and that change leads to another that increases the effect of the first it is a positive feedback event. When positive feedback happens iteratively it is called a positive feedback loop. Scientists fear these as they can lead to runaway change. If the ice ceases to absorb heat a positive feedback loop will occur. 

Sea ice is white, which reflects heat. Ice that has melted becomes heat-absorbing water which then causes the already dangerous rate of warming to accelerate. Arctic ice absorption of heat stabilizes the world’s temperatures. Climate Scientist Kris Van Steenbergen recently tweeted the 2021 predictions for Arctic Sea ice thickness. He wrote, “I don’t like the word “panic”… but I believe it’s time to panic a little.”

On 9 August, The Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change issued a press release to introduce the first instalment of IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report. “Climate change widespread, rapid, and intensifying.” The first paragraph of the report states that, “Scientists are observing changes in the Earth’s climate in every region and across the whole climate system…Many of the changes observed in the climate are unprecedented in thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of years, and some of the changes already set in motion – such as continued sea level rise– are irreversible over hundreds to thousands of years.”

In 2020 and 2021 wildfires swept across South-East Europe, the US, Canada, Siberia, Australia and the Amazon while floods deluged parts of Europe. Without the correct action climate change will cause alternating record-breaking heat waves and extreme weather events.

What next?

The UK government has an opportunity to be a pioneer of the solution to the world’s most urgent problem. It even has a plan provided by Professor Dieter Helm in the conclusion of his book Net Zero. Instead of acting responsibly, the government deceives the public and carries on as usual. The stark reality is we have run out of time. This government is lying to us, the people, on a life-threatening issue that could destroy life on Earth.

I don’t hold much hope for COP26. The UK government is hosting this UN international conference. What the Government and the Conservative Party say is not consistent with what they do. They create a false picture: for example, that the UK is doing better than it actually is at reducing emissions. They could have set an example that was followed by the world, instead they are engaged in a trade war with France. They have no plan that has a chance of working in time. Backing the Climate and Ecological Emergency Bill (CEEB) would have been the correct action to take. COP26 will result in some promises that are not met with no penalties incurred for failure to meet them. The last COP wasted time. We haven’t time to mess around.

What can we do? We have an inactive government deceiving and reassuring the public while endangering life on this unique planet through inaction. The author’s recommendation is for those who are concerned to support the CEEB, which has been drafted by scientists, legal experts, ecological economists and environmentalists, the CEEB is designed specifically to reverse the climate and ecological breakdown that we are facing.

For more from Richard Price visit

Photos from local photographer Bob Beaney whose calendar for 2022 is now available for £5. He will pass on £1 for every copy sold to the many social action projects that Kings Church Hastings are engaged in, such as the “Food Bank” and “Baby Basics”

We hope you have enjoyed reading this article. The future of our volunteer led, non-profit publication would be far more secure with the aid of a small donation. You can also support local journalism by becoming a friend of HIP. It only takes a minute and we would be very grateful.